90.9 WBUR - Boston's NPR news station
Top Stories:
PLEDGE NOW
Here and Now with Robin Young
Public radio's live
midday news program
With sponsorship from
Mathworks - Accelerating the pace of engineering and science
Accelerating the pace
of engineering and science
Monday, September 9, 2013

The Lehman Brothers Bankruptcy, Five Years Later

Lehman Brother's building in Manhattan, before the company filed for bankruptcy. (Edgar Zuniga, Jr./Flickr)

Lehman Brothers’ building in Manhattan, before the company filed for bankruptcy in September 2008. (Edgar Zuniga, Jr./Flickr)

Five years ago this week, the historic Wall Street institution Lehman Brothers collapsed.

With home prices falling and mortgage-backed securities in jeopardy, it was the worst panic on Wall Street since the Great Depression.

The Dow has now returned to pre-crisis levels, but have we learned anything since the Lehman collapse? Are we any safer?

Guest

Transcript

MEGHNA CHAKRABARTI, HOST:

From NPR and WBUR Boston, I'm Meghna Chakrabarti, in for Robin Young. It's HERE AND NOW.

Nearly five years ago, people woke up this financial news...

(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED NEWS)

UNIDENTIFIED MAN: The American investment bank, Lehman Brothers, has filed for bankruptcy in New York. That's happened in the last few minutes. It means the Wall Street institution, which has been in business for 150 years and survived the Great Depression, is now the most high-profile casualty of the credit crunch.

CHAKRABARTI: Well, at that time, Lehman Brothers had been the fourth largest investment bank in the world. Many thought it was too big fail. But the government refused to bail it out and financial markets collapsed. The stock market is going gangbusters now, but are banks really safer? And could another crisis be looming eventually? Cardiff Garcia, reporter for the Financial Times, joins us. And, Cardiff, let's dig into this. But first of all, take us back to 2008...

CARDIFF GARCIA: Sure.

CHAKRABARTI: ...and reminds us how really those bad mortgages ended up undermining Lehman Brothers.

GARCIA: Sure. So in very simple terms, remember what investment banks do. They borrow money in some markets, and then they do things in other markets, like they lend money or they put together these complicated financial instruments. Well, Lehman Brothers had to pay back some of its loans, but those loans or its debt were in very short-term markets. So the institutions lending it money got very nervous that it wouldn't be able to pay them back. They all made a run on the bank, essentially, in these very short-term markets. And then this similar dynamic played out at other institutions before there was a bailout, and that's what led to the crisis.

CHAKRABARTI: OK. And so since then, we've had a lot of hearings, you know, various heads of all these investment banks have - had to do the walk-of-shame...

GARCIA: Yep.

CHAKRABARTI: ...in front of Congress. We've had financial reform regulation.

GARCIA: Yep.

CHAKRABARTI: But people have to be wondering, is it enough? Is the financial system really safer at its core level than it was in 2008?

GARCIA: The financial system is safer. But I think it's very important not to exaggerate that answer because the main reason it is safer is simply that people are still paying attention. The memory of the crisis is still very firmly as - it's hasn't quite faded yet. So the question isn't whether or not it's safer now, but whether or not it will be safer in 10 to 15 years, whether or not we put in place the kinds of rules and regulations that will keep it safe. And that's a much more complicated question.

Now, there is some good news. Some of these rules are working. Banks have more capital. They can more easily absorb losses. This is good and, hopefully, the regulators will stay on their case. There's also less debt overall, and that tends to make the financial system safer. But keep in mind that this was a multi-faceted crisis. It wasn't just about what caused the crisis. It's that the crisis exposed a number of other vulnerabilities that people weren't aware of, and not all of those vulnerabilities have been fixed. So there's a lot of work to do before we can say that we're finished, and that we've solved the problem of crisis. That's going to be an ongoing issue.

CHAKRABARTI: So let's talk a little bit more about that. I mean, one of the vulnerabilities...

GARCIA: Sure.

CHAKRABARTI: ...that was exposed was that all these big banks, you know, they had their fingers in each other's business. They were very interconnected and part of the reason was, what, those bad mortgages were being securitized. The risk was being spread across institutions. And have banks then fundamentally changed the way they handle mortgages now?

GARCIA: Not enough, I'm afraid. You know, it's not just mortgages, by the way. I mean, there's all kinds of other operations that banks undertake that are still not transparent enough. We've got an example of that with JPMorgan and the London Whale. And so the issue is, how do we make these markets a little bit more transparent? And how do we make - keep making the banks a little bit safer? That's a very complicated question, but to make the answer short, no, the work's not done yet. So it's not just about mortgages.

A lot of scrutiny's has been placed on the housing market. It's also just about the way banks fundamentally operate. They are still very interconnected. They're also still very big. Some have gotten even bigger. And they might still be too big to manage in many instances. So the work of regulators hasn't been finished yet.

CHAKRABARTI: Cardiff Garcia is a reporter for the Financial Times. Cardiff, thanks so much.

GARCIA: Thanks, Meghna. Great to be here.

CHAKRABARTI: And, listeners, let us know what you think, what you remember from that financial collapse, which began five years ago this week. Let's know at hereandnow.org. We'll be back in a minute. It's HERE AND NOW. Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.


Please follow our community rules when engaging in comment discussion on this site.
  • jdsimp

    The only thing I would address, would be who made money off this collapse. The Government officials who gave a pass to some of the highers up, and brought them into Govt post, then made 10′s of millions off the collapse. But were found to have done nothing illegal. Where did that story go?

  • Mitch Doll

    Mr. Garcia spoke of the need for long-term protection against a recurrance of the investment bank gambling (that is what it was & is, ongoing, at a lesser rate because of the current vigilance he noted) that led to the global financial crisis. Several US Senators, in an unusual bi-partisan effort, are already pushing a bill to restore the major provision of the Banking Act of 1933, known also as Glass-Steagall, which separates investment banking from commercial banking, preventing speculators from accessing government (in other words, tax-payer) insured deposits, public loan assets, etc…. The original Banking Act of 1933 prevented melt-down for 66 years, until the elimination of this key element in 1999. What better basic protection could be found?!

Robin and Jeremy

Robin Young and Jeremy Hobson host Here & Now, a live two-hour production of NPR and WBUR Boston.

August 28 Comment

Catching Up With The Polyphonic Spree

The choral rock band out of Dallas, Texas, has been thrilling audiences with its live performances for over a decade.

August 28 5 Comments

‘Enormous’ Growth Of Ocean Garbage Patch

The oceanographer who discovered the floating island of trash in 1997 says he's shocked by how much it's grown.

August 27 Comment

Veteran Honored, But Struggles To Keep Business Open

Former Marine Matt Victoriano is being recognized as a "Champion of Change" at the White House.

August 27 40 Comments

In Defense Of Schlock Music: Why We Love/Hate It

Music critic Jody Rosen defends the kind of over-the-top, sentimental songs that Journey, Lionel Richie, Billy Joel and Prince made famous.