PLEDGE NOW
Here and Now with Robin Young and Jeremy Hobson
Public radio's live
midday news program
With sponsorship from
Mathworks - Accelerating the pace of engineering and science
Accelerating the pace
of engineering and science
Monday, March 18, 2013

Gay Marriage Legal Opinion A Hit At Weddings

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Chief Justice Margaret Marshall, author of the 2003 majority decision allowing gay marriage, is pictured in May 2005. (George Rizer/AP)

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Chief Justice Margaret Marshall, author of the 2003 majority decision allowing gay marriage, is pictured in May 2005. (George Rizer/AP)

As the Supreme Court takes up the issue of gay marriage next week, we thought we’d take a quick look at an unexpected effect of the 2003 Massachusetts decision to allow same-sex marriage.

Margaret Marshall, Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court from 1999 to 2010, wrote the majority opinion in the 2003 “Goodridge v. Department of Public Health” case that was the first in the country.

Her eloquent words not only made history, but in recent years they’ve also proved to be a popular reading choice at weddings, not only for gay couples but heterosexual couples as well.

Marshall, now retired, told Here & Now, “I don’t think too many judges think when they write opinions that it’s going to be poetry, but from time to time I’m sent a program from a wedding, and it’s always touching when I see Shakespeare, John Donne, Margaret Marshall … very good company.”

Excerpts of the majority opinion by Chief Justice Marshall:
(Click here to read the whole decision)

Civil marriage is at once a deeply personal commitment to another human being and a highly public celebration of the ideals of mutuality, companionship, intimacy, fidelity, and family. “It is an association that promotes a way of life, not causes; a harmony in living, not political faiths; a bilateral loyalty, not commercial or social projects.” Because it fulfills yearnings for security, safe haven, and connection that express our common humanity, civil marriage is an esteemed institution, and the decision whether and whom to marry is among life’s momentous acts of self-definition.

It is undoubtedly for these concrete reasons, as well as for its intimately personal significance, that civil marriage has long been termed a “civil right.”

Without the right to marry – or more properly, the right to choose to marry – one is excluded from the full range of human experience and denied full protection of the laws for one’s “avowed commitment to an intimate and lasting human relationship.” Because civil marriage is central to the lives of individuals and the welfare of the community, our laws assiduously protect the individual’s right to marry against undue government incursion.

That same-sex couples are willing to embrace marriage’s solemn obligations of exclusivity, mutual support, and commitment to one another is a testament to the enduring place of marriage in our laws and in the human spirit.

In separate news on Monday, Hillary Clinton has thrown her support behind gay marriage, in a video posted by the Human Rights Campaign:

Guest:

  • Margaret Marshall, Chief Justice of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court from 1999 to 2010.

Please follow our community rules when engaging in comment discussion on this site.
Robin and Jeremy

Robin Young and Jeremy Hobson host Here & Now, a live two-hour production of NPR and WBUR Boston.

July 31 23 Comments

What Is It About Cecil That Makes People Care?

The lion's death wasn't the only shocking poaching incident this week, as five elephants were slaughtered in Kenya.

July 31 Comment

New Film Based On Travels With David Foster Wallace Opens

The film, called "The End Of The Tour," is based on David Lipsky's five-day road trip with the late author in 1996.

July 31 Comment

Experimental Ebola Vaccine Shows Promise To Stop Virus

The experimental vaccine was tested in Guinea. World Health Organization officials are hopeful it works to stop the deadly virus.

July 30 27 Comments

NAACP To Begin 860-Mile ‘Journey For Justice’ March

The march, which will travel from Selma, Ala. to Washington, seeks to highlight vulnerable communities subject to regressive voting rights.