Here & Now's Robin Young speaks with Richard Pacelle, professor of political science at the University of Tennessee, to find some answers.
Boston’s City Hall, which has been called a “giant concrete harmonica,” seems to make it onto every list of hated buildings.
Of course Boston is not alone. Almost every place in the country has a building hated by most people, but loved by many architects. What is it that makes these buildings so despised?
Brian Sirman, who teaches a popular class at Boston University called “reviled architecture,” told Here & Now that some buildings lack aesthetics, while others are excessively showy or complex. And others, such as Boston City Hall, are totally out of sync with their surroundings.
“That style of concrete architecture has really fallen out of favor recently,” Sirman said of Boston City Hall’s brutalist style. “Also people perceive that it doesn’t represent Boston. When people think of Boston architecture, they tend to picture the Back Bay or Beacon Hill with genteel red brick buildings. This is not that style of architecture. And also in recent years, it’s really been a neglected building.”
Buildings that attract negative reactions include the San Francisco’s Museum of Modern Art, the Denver Public Library, The Longaberger Company’s headquarters, and Seattle’s EMP Museum.
The EMP Museum, formerly called the Experience Music Project, was designed by Frank Gehry.
“Apparently, Gehry’s inspiration for that building was a broken guitar – a smashed guitar,” Sirman said. “But it has that same kind of wild geometry that we see in a lot of Gehry’s other projects, that actually has incited criticism even for some of his slightly less hated buildings, [such as] the Status Center here in Cambridge at MIT. It leaks, it’s seen as not functional by some. There were vast cost overruns.”