90.9 WBUR - Boston's NPR news station
Top Stories:
PLEDGE NOW
Friday, March 23, 2012

China Warns Olympic Athletes About Banned Substances In Restaurant Meat

(Flickr/Allie's.Dad)

Chinese marathoners training for the Olympics have been told to watch what they eat– and we’re not talking about junk food.

Some are raising their own chickens, others are eating yak meat from local herdsmen in order to avoid restaurant and store meat that can contain a chemical called clenbuterol.

Clenbuterol In Meat

Clenbuterol is sometimes fed to livestock to produce leaner meat, but the substance is banned and is considered a performance-enhancing drug by the World Anti-Doping Agency.

You won’t find clenbuterol in American livestock, but other substances are used here– some of which are banned in China. For example, Ractopamine, a feed-additive used in the U.S., is banned in Taiwan, China, and the EU.

The Debate About Ractopamine

Health officials in the U.S., Canada, Mexico, South Korea and elsewhere feel it is safe in meat used for human consumption.

Dr. Scott Hurd of Iowa State University says ractopamine does not have the toxicity of clenbuterol and it quickly clears from the animal.

“Once it gets to the dinner plate, there’s virtually none of it left in the meat,” he told Here & Now‘s Robin Young.

Ractopamine is used in animals, says Dr Hurd, to increase efficiency and reduce the carbon footprint.

But on the advocacy website AlterNet, columnist Martha Rosenberg compiles criticism of ractopamine:

A article in the 2003 Journal of Animal Science confirms that “ractopamine does affect the behavior, heart rate and catecholamine profile of finishing pigs and making them more difficult to handle and potentially more susceptible to handling and transport stress.”

Guest:

  • Dr. Scott Hurd, assistant professor, College of Veterinary Medicine, Iowa State University, former member of the Food Safety Inspection Service, USDA

We welcome comments from all of our listeners. Post below. Please stay on topic and be civil. Comments may be moderated by us, but you are solely responsible for the content of your comments.

  • Eric Matus

    Good informative article, right up to the last part where you ask about “Pink Slime” KPBS continues to confuse the points being made.  The protest against pink slime is based on an absolute scale of safety while Dr Hurd is talking about safety in terms of using the product.  The safest approach is to not use “Pink Slime” at all due to it’s source frequently being exposed to e coli.  However Dr. Hurd’s point is if you’re going to use “Pink Slime,” a choice based on cost benefit vice absolute safety, then ammoniation use is safe and necessary to avoid e. coli.  I know you guys are smart enough to sort out these two arguments.  Both are valid.  Not using Pink Slime is the safest choice if you can afford it.

  • BHA in Vermont

    Given all the health warnings of this stuff related to people, I wouldn’t want to give it to animals either.

With Sponsorship from:
Accelerating the pace of engineering and science
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
Two men go through the damage surrounding the Moore Medical Center and damaged vehicals after a tornado moves through Moore, Okla. on Monday, May 20, 2013. (Alonzo Adams/AP)

Kelly Frey, the editor of Oklahoma’s big daily newspaper The Oklahoman, is from El Reno, Okla. and describes what it’s like to grow up in “tornado alley.”

Comment | more »
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
Adam Scudder, Trisha Milittle, Tamra Jones and Bridget Kline, from left, take shelter at Pelican's Restaurant in northern Oklahoma City as a tornado passes nearby Friday night, May 9, 2003. (Andrew Laker/AP)

Are home-based shelters really enough to hold back an F5 category tornado, which can have winds upwards of 300 miles per hour? And what about people who don’t have home-based shelters?

3 Comments | more »
Monday, May 20, 2013
(watergategame.com)

If you find yourself waxing nostalgic for the kind of 1970s investigative journalism that led to the Watergate hearings, you can now relive the chills and thrills of the Washington Post investigation.

Comment | more »
From Twitter