90.9 WBUR - Boston's NPR news station
Top Stories:
PLEDGE NOW
Here and Now with Robin Young
Public radio's live
midday news program
With sponsorship from
Mathworks - Accelerating the pace of engineering and science
Accelerating the pace
of engineering and science
Friday, January 7, 2011

Psychiatrist Explores Dark Side Of Motherhood

Writers from Erma Bombeck to Anne Lamott have confessed to harboring dark thoughts about their children, even though they loved them dearly.

Psychiatrist Dr. Barbara Almond calls it the hidden side of motherhood, and says mothers shouldn’t be afraid to be more open about it.

In her new book ,”The Monster Within: The Hidden Side Of Motherhood,” Almond explores mothers’ negative feelings about themselves and their children and explains why those feelings need to be addressed and expressed.

Barbara’s son, author and Here & Now literary critic Steve Almond, also joins the conversation with his take on Barbara’s parenting style.

The Monster Within: The Hidden Side Of Motherhood

By Barbara Almond

The Ubiquity of Maternal Ambivalence

Ambivalence is a combination of the loving and hating feelings we experience toward those who are important to us. Maternal ambivalence is a normal phenomenon. It is ubiquitous. It is not a crime or a failing. This book is about maternal ambivalence.

“Admitting to Mixed Feelings about Motherhood,” by Elizabeth Hayt, appeared as the lead article in the Styles section of the Sunday New York Times on May 12, 2002—Mother’s Day. Here was one expression of the current groundswell of revolt against the idealization of motherhood in the 1980s and 1990s resulting from the enthusiasm and perfectionism of the baby boomers as they took on the “job” of parenting. Two days before reading this article I had talked with a young woman in her mid-thirties, the mother of two small children, about a parenting class she had attended. Although she had taken the class to learn more about child development, especially during toddlerhood, her most intense reaction was one of vast relief on discovering that other parents could feel exhausted, lonely, bored, and short of temper with their children. She learned she wasn’t alone. As this woman is both educated and emotionally sensitive, the degree of her relief was impressive. I suspect that the majority of women taking that class shared her feelings.

On July 2, 2001, ten months before the publication of the New York Times article, the cover of Newsweek carried the shocking headline, “{hrs}‘I Killed My Children’: What Made Andrea Yates Snap?” Andrea Yates was a depressed nurse, the mother of five children under the age of seven, who one morning, in the grip of severe postpartum psychosis, became desperate, lost control, and drowned all of them. The article was followed by Anna Quindlen’s Last Word column, titled “Playing God on No Sleep,” in which Quindlen admitted frankly that as horrified as she and others were by the murders, some part of her understood all too well how it could happen.

This book addresses the subject underlying the young mother’s reaction to her parenting class and the two articles, maternal ambivalence—that mixture of loving and hating feelings that all mothers experience toward their children and the anxiety, shame, and guilt that the negative feelings engender in them. If you hate your parents, siblings, spouse, friends, colleagues, or people of the opposite sex, or other races, religions, and nationalities, you are considered unfortunate, unreasonable, bigoted, interpersonally difficult, even seriously disturbed. But if you hate your children, you are considered monstrous—immoral, unnatural, and evil. It is my purpose to explore and understand the spectrum of maternal ambivalent feelings, thoughts, and behaviors and where possible to see them for the normal, inevitable, and ubiquitous phenomena they are. My secondary purpose is to encourage women to seek help of various kinds, including the kind of psychological treatment in which they can be heard and understood without negative judgment or condemnation.

Controversies surrounding the emotional investments and duties of motherhood have probably existed for centuries, but this past century is most pertinent to the unique dilemmas of contemporary women. Before World War II the “ideal” middle-class mother stayed home and cared for her family. Of course, many women worked out of necessity or inclination, but that was not considered ideal. World War II partially disrupted this arrangement as middle-class women put their children into day care centers and went to work. In the late 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s they returned to the “bliss” of domestic suburban life. When Betty Friedan exposed their hidden, and largely unexpressed, misery in The Feminine Mystique, she acknowledged women’s wishes to also have work and a life outside of the home. Her ideas heralded the more open expression of ambivalence about motherhood that characterized the feminist movement of the late 1960s and 1970s. This ambivalence may have been more openly expressed at that time, but it was never really acceptable then, nor is it now.

Several contemporary writers have tackled the idea that motherhood is not automatically an all-fulfilling state. Their work has been greeted with outrage and discomfort. As cited in Hayt’s New York Times article, these writers are acutely aware of the controversial nature of their writing. For example, Peggy Orenstein says of the mothers she interviewed for Flux: Women on Sex, Work, Love, Kids and Life in a Half-Changed World:
It was almost furtive for them to admit motherhood is not fulfilling. . . . It actually makes me feel deviant and anti-mother to say that. But I’m not. It’s like being anti-American. Motherhood silences women. The Kryptonite words for women are fat, slut, bad mother and selfish. The words make us lose our powers just like Superman loses his in the face of Kryptonite.1

Barbara Almond, author of "The Monster Within: The Hidden Side Of Motherhood."

Barbara Almond, author of "The Monster Within: The Hidden Side Of Motherhood."

While “fat” reflects the mania for being thin and in shape that has possessed American women for the past forty years, regardless of whether they are mothers, “slut” and “selfish” are intimately connected to “bad mother,” the most Kryptonite-laden term of all. Good mothers are not sexy—that is, they are not sluts—and they put their children’s interests before their own at all times—that is, they are not selfish.

The concept of maternal ambivalence and its forbidden quality has been explored by various writers but still remains highly unacceptable in our culture. This book sets out to present the spectrum of maternal ambivalence, its presence in all women, the dangers inherent in keeping it a silent phenomenon, and the means with which women can approach their own ambivalence in a healthier way. The negative, or hating, side of maternal ambivalence is the crime “that dares not speak its name” of our time. Aggression in women—the behavioral manifestation of their hating feelings—is generally considered problematic, that is, not feminine. But when women’s aggression is aimed at their children, it becomes even more unacceptable. It is one of those societal problems that fill us with outrage and horror, even as some part of us secretly understands its normality.

Since the Enlightenment and especially during the Victorian era, childhood has come into its own.2 This increased valuation of childhood developed hand in hand with the gradual rise in importance of the nuclear family and the recognition of the value of education in the growing middle class. Although the children of the poor continued to labor in mines and factories, especially during the industrial revolution, child labor laws and universal education eventually released them to be children.3 With the increased importance of the family came an idealization of the mother-child bond and greatly heightened expectations of maternal care. This idealization was most marked in upper- and middle-class society, but it was not absent in working-class families. A major class difference in child rearing was the reliance of the upper classes on domestic help for child care and household work. It should be noted that it is much easier to idealize motherhood when someone else is doing the lion’s share of actual child care.

The idealization of motherhood has continued into the present and grown in intensity. Two additional problems increase the strains that contemporary mothers face. First, as families move great distances from each other in search of better jobs and housing, the extended family living in one place has become less common. Fifty years ago, grandparents, aunts and uncles, and older siblings often helped raise children. The breakup of the extended family now places the burden of child care squarely on the parents, usually the mother. Second, the breakdown of the nuclear family—the current divorce rate is about 50 percent and the number of children born to single mothers 25 percent—more often than not leaves both mother and child quite on their own to deal with their complicated mutual psychological needs and interactions.

Paradoxically, as the conditions of mothering become more difficult, more is expected from mothers, and mothers, in turn, expect more from themselves. Fierce and demanding pressures surround contemporary mothering. Perfectionistic standards of childcare in every area—feeding, sleep, play, emotional and intellectual development—prevail. Breast-feeding, the healthy and natural way to feed infants, has become more a fanatical pursuit than a preference; babies must, at all costs, sleep on their backs even if they sleep better on their tummies, so they won’t die of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS); toys must be carefully vetted for their educational value rather than their appeal; and so on.4 Add to this conflicts between work and home and the absence of family support systems, and you have a situation that leads inevitably to increasing frustration and resentment as mothers are expected, and expect themselves, to be perfect.

Here’s a recent example of what I’m describing. “Cosmopolitan Moms,” an article by Stacy Lu published in the Fashion and Style section of the New York Times, describes a group of eight Philadelphia mothers who meet every Friday afternoon with their children for a play group. But this is a very unorthodox play group, for on this one afternoon each week, while the children play and drink fruit juice, the mothers treat themselves to a glass or two of wine or beer. The article highlights that these women are merely seeking a release from the pressures of motherhood. They are not out to get drunk, nor are they acting irresponsibly. Instead, they are seeking, as the article put it, “a way to hold on to a part of their lives that existed before they had children and to bond over a shared disdain for the almost sadistically stressful world of modern parenting.”

Maternal ambivalence must be increased in this “world of modern parenting” where women feel they should be able to do it all. One could argue that the deferment of childbearing, so common among educated and professional people and so rationalized by the availability of assisted reproduction in the form of in vitro fertilization and other techniques, is in no small part an expression of this ambivalence. The declining birthrate in first world countries may be another manifestation of ambivalence about parenting. Advanced reproductive technology doesn’t always work, but it allows the delay of a decision that is more difficult for many women than they can easily admit. For not only is it unwomanly not to love your children unconditionally, but it is considered unnatural not to want children in the first place.

Interestingly from the paternal point of view, these issues seem to play out a bit differently. The father’s concerns have more to do with providing the means for the biological and social survival of the family. Although men struggle with wishes to have or not have children, and with issues of good fathering, they do not hold themselves so thoroughly responsible for the emotional care of their offspring. While those concerns can be deep and terribly troubling, striking at the heart of what it means to be a man and manly, the emotional well-being of the family is generally laid at the mother’s doorstep. The emotional well-being of the children especially is seen as the mother’s territory, for the father plays a very important role in protecting the needs of the adults in the family.

Although it is not my purpose to discuss the biological validity of our assumptions about women and children, current sociobiologists and primatologists, such as Sarah Blaffer Hrdy, maintain that loving motherhood is not automatically programmed into the female of our species but is an extremely complex equation of genetic, evolutionary, emotional, and social factors aided by powerful hormonal influences.5 My interest lies in exploring some of the emotional dimensions and qualities in the spectrum of maternal ambivalence in an effort to describe, understand, and “normalize” it—that is, to recognize that however problematic this ambivalence may be, it is part of the human condition. And this recognition is crucially important. Too many women suffer as they attempt to be perfect mothers, an effort driven in part to cover over their ambivalence. Modern “maternally correct” mothers are literally driving themselves and their offspring crazy in their quest for maternal perfection, which can only be proven by the perfection of their offspring. And it doesn’t work! It’s hard on the mothers themselves, their children, and their spouses, and it needs to be seen for the impossible goal that it truly is.

© 2010 by The Regents of the University of California


Please follow our community rules when engaging in comment discussion on this site.
  • mother

    This is one of the most important shows I have heard.
    I suffer from severe, debilitating anxiety (having recovered from severe depression) and am raising a very hyper, distractable ADHD young child as an unemployed widow in a wealthy suburb. Frustration and irritation lead to quick-trigger temper. Love, dote on my child. HATE my own temper.

    Thank you for this – from the depths of my and my child’s heart. (no ambivalance here)

  • Connie in NC

    What!? Loving your *child* unconditionally IS the goal, but that does not mean you have to love their *behavior* or their decisions. I can’t imagine yelling “I’ve had enough of you for now” like the author poorly suggested. I’d remember a phrase like would be imprinted in me for the rest of my life!! My sister (who I consider a GREAT modern mother) simply says firmly, “I love you, but am not happy with your actions/behavior. Here are your options: ….” giving the children more appropriate behavioral choices to choose from. Needless to say, I won’t be reading your guest’s book.

  • Kate

    I am so happy that other people actually have these feelings. I am 24 years old and recently married. I do not have childern and have NO desire to have them,however, coming from a small town everyone is expecting me to excited about starting a family. I have fears that if I have a child then my other accomplishments will not be viewed seriously because I will be labled a “mom” and noting else. I also do not want to give up my freedoms and I am afraid if do have a child I will resent them for these fears. I have not read the book, but it is on my list!

  • Maggie

    I have had dark thoughts about my children when they were young when I was at my wits end with no sleep and a child going on 3 hours of non stop screaming. Even though I never acted on those I would cry alone later with my overwhelming guilt for having those feelings. I have never mentioned these feelings to anyone as I was always afraid that the “authorities” would show up on my door step shortly after and take my children from such an awful mother. Now my children are older and I can still lose my mind at times but I explain that sometimes Mommy can get overwhelmed at times. I can only hope that it lets my kids know that it’s ok to feel like this so that they won’t feel alone when they have ther own children and possibly find themselves in the same situation

  • Lou Fiscarelli

    Hi Robin,

    I am a man. I heard your interview today about the monster within.

    Man, was I P.O. ed when I heard you refer to Andrea Yates as a person who “hated her children.” From the getgo I always felt Andrea Yates loved her children. She was left alone every day by a husband who apparently didn’t see the horrific stress his wife was in and probably suffering from acute post-partum depression. I always blamed HIM for being the person who was morally irresponsible. NOT HER. AND she was NOT a person who “hated her children.”

    Thanks!

    Lou Fiscarelli

  • Tony Kreamer

    So is this book gonna help me understand Lars Von Trier’s film Antichrist any better?

  • http://quiensabe.com Henry Halff

    I find it curious that, in this day and age, no mention was made of fathers and their ambivalence to their children. In my experience, fathers have their own problems. Among them are the inability to understand or live up to the mother’s standards for childrearing, the feeling of being fenced out of the family by the mother’s bond with their child, and, of course, the kid that just won’t stop crying.

    If, as a society, we expect fathers to play a larger role in their children’s upbringing, then we need to pay attention to issues of concern to those fathers. The conversation that I just heard seemed to come from a time when dads were largely absent from the child rearing scene.

  • anothermother

    This was a great piece! I’ve added this book to my reading list. Thanks!!

  • Gloria Kohut

    Connie in NC is on the mark. Screaming at a child of any age is not likely to be productive, and may be destructive. Far better to consistently allow the child to choose and face consequences– age appropriately, of course.
    Furthermore, the idea that allowing a child to make and to learn from mistakes stems from a parent’s ambivalence and negative emotions toward that child, as expressed during the broadcast, is something I find absurd. Love means nurturing the child’s growth into an adult.
    That said, this is a valuable topic; the discussion provides much-needed relief and support. Can anyone name ANY life choice about which one is NEVER ambivalent?

  • Shannon

    A great show, thank you so much for doing it and talking about the issue. Many of us mothers feel such shame and cannot talk about our feelings out of fear that we will be judged and looked down upon. Of course we LOVE OUR CHILDREN but we also have feelings that aren’t always good.

  • Sonja

    I agree with this author that the expectations of mothers in the US are unrealistic and damaging to all – particularly to mothers. However, I think her solution of encouraging mothers to acknowledge and accept their ambivalence perpetuates the expectations for mothers. A better solution, I believe, would be to expand the responsibilities for raising children to fathers, extended families, and all of society as most traditional and many modern societies do. Mothers have no unique resposibility to their children and they cannot raise healthy children primarily on their own.

  • Michelle

    I heard this on the radio and found it interesting and upsetting. It reminded me of a video we saw in my Women’s Health class at Eastern Illinois University back in the late 1990s. In this video, various mothers talked about how unfulfilling they found motherhood, and how hard it was, etc. I was horrified and wondered why they’d chosen to become mothers if that’s what they felt. The instructor told us “This is how it really is.” But I remember thinking, “Well, it won’t be that way for my future kids.” Fast forward, and I have two college-aged children, so I can now say that not all mothers do feel all this negativity. I will not try to say that every single moment was pure bliss, but it was pretty darned good — even in toddler and teen years. I enjoyed my children’s childhoods very much, and I continue to enjoy my 18-year-old son and my 21-year-old daughter. While raising them, however, I couldn’t help but notice many mothers around me did not seem to be enjoying their children as I was. I raised my children according to what is now being called Attachment Parenting. I slept with them at night, I nursed long-term, I carried them in a sling or similar product, etc. I could never understand a woman who would insist on bottlefeeding as her choice, especially those who propped the bottle, or who said they needed to work at their career even when the child was only 6 weeks old because motherhood was so unfulfilling on its own. I couldn’t understand how anyone could hear a baby cry and not feel moved to hold the child. I wondered if some of those other mothers could possibly be loving their children the way I love mine. And now, after hearing this radio interview, I can’t help but think that that’s the case. Some people don’t feel the same love and bond that I’ve always felt. Would mothers feel more close to their children if they used AP parenting tools? Or do mothers who have a more maternal bend naturally feel drawn to use AP? How many moms feel this ambivalence? Would encouraging AP as the social norm help at all? Or can one fine women who wholeheartedly wanted to have children, who throw themselves into building close attachments via all the usual AP behaviors, who nevertheless feel the ambivalence? I feel this would be a very good area for more research.

  • Daniels mommy

    Michelle. I am an AP mom of two and I feel massive ambivalence. i love my kids far more than life, but I am not happy. I know a lot of other AP mothers and a lot (possibly even most) feel some of this. Some more some less. My personal opinion is that a large part of the problem is how little support most women have. One person cannot bring up children by themselves, two cannot do it easily. A supportive network and society are more likely than breastfeeding or cosleeping to reduce the amount of difficulties most women have.

  • http://download7k.com Naresh

    I agree with this topic that there monster within us. Its a general thing that hating the religion, opposite sex, country, etc all those things are common in human nature. But when it comes to one own life own children then its a crime. Getting angry upto some extent is okay, it should cross the limit. If it does then the results will be shown in the above case. Anyeways thanks for sharing such an interesting article with us.

  • http://www.jfcsboston.org/CERS Debbie Whitehill

    Thank you, Robin and Barbara, for giving this issue the attention it deserves.
    All mothers experience ambivalence, but admitting these darker feelings often involves much shame and guilt. Too many women suffer in silence…which can prolong their anxiety or depression. With the added pressures of trying to “do it all” and “do it perfectly” coupled with the proliferation of information available at our fingertips, we have only worsened this challenging situation.
    At the Center For Early Relationship Support at Jewish Family and Children’s Service in Waltham, MA, we understand the mixture of feelings and anxiety that accompanies parenthood. We provide a variety of support and therapeutic services for families with babies and young children. Both our Visiting Moms Program and our weekly support groups are free of charge. Visit http://www.jfcsboston.org/CERS for more information.

  • ad

    What I find disturbing about the above are the generalizations. I am sure there are women who are unhappy [and maybe even hate their children] and others who don’t. Not ALL mothers experience hate towards their children! – Even if they are not AP moms :) and yes, raising children is not always a piece of cake – but what is? This discussion is just a sad reflection of how insecure some women are in this day and age. If you want to be a mom – be a happy mom. If you want to work – do it. Right on Connie! I am a mostly happy working mom and never hated my kids. I think I can skip this book.

  • Parent-of-teens

    I completely agree with Connie in NC, that separating the child from their behavior is fundamental to parenting…at any age. My children are now teens and I’m a divorced mother with multiple careers, no local family and no child support due to an ex who is a struggling alcoholic. My “community” of support is almost nonexistent because I have little time to maintain those relationships as well. I know what it feels like to be overwhelmed, exhausted, depleted and yes, more than occasionally disappointed in my children’s decision making as they grow older. Some have really been disheartening. I have questioned “is this really how my life was meant to be?” and “what might I have done better/differently?” as a parent. But it’s my life, my family, and my responsibility I can’t imagine hating my kids.

    No child, of any age, is left unaffected by hateful things said by a parent. They DO need to be reminded that while a parent’s love is unconditional; approval or endorsement of a behavior is not. There are age-appropriate, alternative choices to make and consequences to their actions. Just recall that old TV spot regarding this issue; where the mother’s lips were all you would see on the screen and the voice (obviously directed at a child) was saying ” You make me sick!..” I have never forgotten it and it still chills me.

    Language matters. We need to make every effort to use it well. While it is important for parents to know they are not alone and it’s wise to seek help/support for their negative feelings, we don’t need to be encouraged to voice those unedited concerns in such an unproductive way, to our kids. A little instruction (so wisely shared in Connie’s post) is certainly worth more than the price of this book.

  • Lisa

    And that there Michelle is why some women don’t admit their ambivalence – because other women (and men) can’t “understand” how they could feel like this. “I found it bliss, why doesn’t everyone else AP, etc?” Sigh.

Robin and Jeremy

Robin Young and Jeremy Hobson host Here & Now, a live two-hour production of NPR and WBUR Boston.

July 25 Comment

Ebola Epidemic Strikes Top Health Worker

NPR's Jason Beaubien just returned from Sierra Leone, which along with Guinea and Liberia is suffering from the worst ever Ebola outbreak.

July 25 Comment

ER Physician Documents ‘Lost Underground’ Of WWI

Soldiers carved artwork into the walls of vast quarry systems beneath the trenches that defined the war.

July 24 7 Comments

Veterans Say Suicide Is Their Top Concern

That's according to a survey released today by the group Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America (IAVA).

July 24 6 Comments

Modern-Day Amelia Earhart Circumnavigates The Globe

The famous pilot's namesake has became the youngest woman to fly a single-engine aircraft around the world.