90.9 WBUR - Boston's NPR news station
Top Stories:
PLEDGE NOW
Here and Now with Robin Young
Public radio's live
midday news program
With sponsorship from
Mathworks - Accelerating the pace of engineering and science
Accelerating the pace
of engineering and science
Friday, September 13, 2013

Invoking The Holocaust In Times Of War

President Barack Obama addresses the nation in a live televised speech from the East Room of the White House in Washington, Tuesday, Sept. 10, 2013. (Evan Vucci/AP Photo)

President Barack Obama addresses the nation in a live televised speech from the East Room of the White House in Washington, Tuesday, Sept. 10, 2013. (Evan Vucci/AP Photo)

In his address to the nation this week, President Obama spoke directly about chemical weapons in Syria and share his thoughts on “why it matters, and where we go from here.”

He said it matters, because of where humanity has been before: “In World War I, American GIs were among the many thousands killed by deadly gas in the trenches of Europe. In World War II, the Nazis used gas to inflict the horror of the Holocaust.”

Secretary Kerry and Senator Harry Reid also brought up the Holocaust as an example of “when the world did nothing.”

Is it appropriate to invoke the Holocaust in these circumstances? Rabbi Marvin Hier says yes, “because we’re talking about gassing — we’re talking about the same element that the Nazis introduced in 1942.”

Guest

Transcript

MEGHNA CHAKRABARTI, HOST:

This is HERE AND NOW. In his address to the nation this week, President Obama spoke directly about Syrian chemical weapons, saying, quote, "why it matters and where we go from here." It matters, he said, because of where humanity has been before.

PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA: In World War I, American GIs were among the many thousands killed by deadly gas in the trenches of Europe. In World War II, the Nazis used gas to inflict the horror of the Holocaust.

CHAKRABARTI: Now, Obama isn't alone in evoking the Holocaust. Secretary of State John Kerry has also recently made reference to the Second World War, and on Monday, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid was even more explicit.

SENATOR HARRY REID: Millions and millions of civilians and prisoners of war were murdered by gas in Nazi death camps: Belsen, Treblinka, Auschwitz. Never again, swore the world, never again would we permit the use of these poisonous weapons of war.

CHAKRABARTI: Rabbi Marvin Hier is founder and dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, a Jewish human rights center whose mission includes teaching the lessons of the Holocaust for future generations. He joins us from the studios of NPR West. Rabbi Hier, welcome.

RABBI MARVIN HIER: Pleasure to be here.

CHAKRABARTI: So let me ask you rabbi: Do you think it's appropriate for politicians and the president of the United States to make reference to the Holocaust in the Syria crisis?

HIER: Well not in every situation, but in this situation, when you're talking about Syria using gas to murder 1,400 civilians, men, women and children, it would be almost impossible not to reference the Holocaust where gassing first entered the lexicon in a way never before heard of in the annals of mankind.

People think well, we look at the Holocaust where the tally was six million. No, the Holocaust began when they started gassing the first hundred. So therefore there is a historic reference that there's always a beginning to gassing, and if the United States would not have threatened military action, I believe that Syria would have contemplated gassing more people.

CHAKRABARTI: Well, is this what we mean when it's said never again?

HIER: Yes.

CHAKRABARTI: I want you to help us unpack the moral complexity here. There are a lot of people who might say when a president uses reference to the Holocaust, he's just engaging in emotional manipulation and that it's not - the Syrian crisis is not really analogous to the situation in the early days of the Nazis' organized program of mass extermination.

HIER: Well, first of all nothing in history, I hope, will ever compare to what the Nazis did. Look, I've always said the following: We live in Southern California, and we experience a lot of earthquakes. I think the greatest earthquake that ever occurred since they've been tracking is I believe a 9.7 in Alaska. Does that mean that if we experience a 6.4 in Southern California we can't say it's horrible? We can.

CHAKRABARTI: Rabbi Hier, the legacy of the Holocaust is very, very real, but sadly, human history is just rife with acts of genocide and mass murder. Presidents at times have made reference to the Holocaust. At other times they have not. So is there a moral line when it is OK to do so?

HIER: To me it's OK to reference the Holocaust when you're talking about a genocide, but there are limits. In other words, you don't reference the Holocaust in something that we all understand is just a trivialization of the Holocaust. We know when that is.

I don't think that, you know, that you could really make a case that when the Assad regime gases 1,400 people that we should stay away from any references to the Holocaust because it's not comparable. I wouldn't accept that.

CHAKRABARTI: Well, here's why I'm asking, because the fact is that sometimes politicians and national leaders deliberately do not mention the Holocaust, even when a genocide is so plainly ongoing. I mean, there are examples such as Saddam Hussein's gassing of the Kurds in the 1980s or the Rwandan genocide or the massacre of thousands of Bosnian Muslims in Srebrenica in 1995.

So I mean, doesn't that make a president's use of the Holocaust more of a political act rather than a morally courageous one?

HIER: Look, as I said before, I personally have no objection. I would use the Holocaust reference to all the genocides that have occurred after the Holocaust. Those were horrible atrocities against humankind. But there is a time when many political leaders crossed the line, and they used Nazis and the Holocaust where it has no comparison.

But the Syrian situation, I think, merits the reference because we're talking about gassing.

CHAKRABARTI: Rabbi Hier, the Simon Wiesenthal Center mission includes teaching the lessons of the Holocaust for future generations. So the moment we find ourselves in right now, what lessons should we be learning?

HIER: Well, we should learn the following: It's very difficult to predict history. If you look back to the turning point when the world stood at the brink in World War II and the Holocaust occurred, when the Nazis threatened to take over all of mankind, you would be amazed at how many brilliant people thought that you could do business with Hitler.

You had all the editorial writers at the Times of England all saying let's make a deal with Hitler. In retrospect when we look at that, how could so many intelligent people have gotten it wrong? And we may have it wrong now.

CHAKRABARTI: Am I hearing you say - are you dubious of the diplomatic efforts that are going on right now?

HIER: I know - let's take three countries, and I'll name them: Iran, Syria and even Russia. Their greatest expertise is how to say yes when it really means no.

CHAKRABARTI: Well Rabbi Hier, there's a final question I'd like to ask you because earlier this month, you sent a letter to every single member of Congress in which you wrote, quote, "we urge you to vote for a limited strike. This may not be a perfect solution, but it will send a dramatic signal to the Assad regime and all others that you will have to pay a very high price if you continue to perpetrate such crimes against humanity," end quote.

Now you know from the polling from the polling that's been going on that a majority of the American people do not feel the same way. So I wonder, for people listening now who just heard that quote from your letter, what would you tell them if they're wondering rabbi, are more bombs and death really the answer?

HIER: Look, I recognize that the United States, we've had many wars. We're tired about Iraq, especially when the information wasn't correct. But gassing in the hands of tyrants and dictators, that is the most dangerous thing that mankind faces. It's never popular to take on a tyrant.

What did the polls say in 1940 when Churchill made his decision? The polls were all against it. In the beginning, Chamberlain was a very, very popular man. But history has often taught us that, you know, if you operate on the basis of polls, I'm afraid that mankind may not have made it.

CHAKRABARTI: Well, Rabbi Marvin Hier is the founder and dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center. He's speaking to us from NPR West. Rabbi Hier, many, many thanks.

HIER: Thank you.

CHAKRABARTI: Well, we want to know what you think about what the rabbi said. When do you think it is appropriate to evoke the Holocaust? Let us know at hereandnow.org. The news is next, HERE AND NOW. Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.


Please follow our community rules when engaging in comment discussion on this site.
  • ansapphire

    Wow this is a man of God.

    • melovechocolate

      And as a man of God he is supposed to pursue peace.. Even mentioning Winston Churchill’s decision to go to war, and comparing that to Obama’s decision?! HOW can you compare the atrocities of World War 2 to a civil war in Syria? And how foolish (rabbi or no) to believe that bombings “would teach them a lesson”??!! This is a man whom many people listen to and follow, and saying these things on the eve of the day of atonement! A day you’re supposed to seal “the book” with good actions and repentance, and he’s pushing for VIOLENCE!!!? I am absolutely *FARKLEMPT* !!!!!!! Take him off the airwaves!!!

      • melovechocolate

        By the way, if this rabbi is following your post, I’d like to remind him of his responsibility for Tikkun Olam–HEALING the world–not DESTROYING, pushing for violence, or killing (we’d have blood on our hands with our bombs).. A holy man indeed. Aleinu leshabei’ach..We don’t praise G-d when we invoke war.

  • Diane Fleeks

    I have rarely been as furious at an “interviewer” as I am at this. Pounding away to get the Rabbi trying to get him to say what you want does nothing to advance the dialog on this subject. I don’t listen to this show to get another version of Fox News.

    • Distressed

      Exactly what I thought! Rephrasing the question again and again was a complete wast of time. Didn’t your interviewer prepare any questions that would have advanced the interview rather then stalled it on this one opinion? This was What I feared would happen with the new format.

  • Jannison Smith

    The phrase “never again’ is constantly repeated, but why does it not apply to the use of white phosphorus against civilians in Fallujah and Gaza? Why does it not apply to the slow motion destruction of civilians in the West Bank?

  • David Brogan

    As the Rabbi so eloquently said, It is appropriate. However, what is not appropriate is that we are blaming Assad out of hand, with no proof. Given the circumstances, it makes no sense that he would do this; especially since the weapon was not used against the rebels.. It does however make great sense that the Syrian rebels would. They have the motivation to get the USA involved and they, according to several sources, have had the chemicals make available to them.
    Since the US government will not show us the so called, “proof,” it is not unreasonable to conclude, just as the Russians did, that the “proof” is weak at best. Since the Rebels have more motivation then the Assad regime, why do we assume the chemical attack was perpetrated by the Syrian government?
    There are several reasons why the US government would want to see the fall of the Syrian government and none of them have to do with chemical weapons.

  • Will Thomas

    Agree with Jannison Smith re US using white phosphorous in Fallujah and supplying the Israeli military with that chemical substance that acts like napalm does in its criminal action against the civilians of Gaza in 2008-09. I can’t recall president-elect Obama saying anything about that collective punishment towards the people of Gaza either before or after his inauguration. Also, why is Kerry such a hypocrite when he well knows the US used chemical warfare against the people of Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos, called Agent Orange which has produced large numbers of people in America and in SE Asia who have developed cancers and in many of their children, birth defects and abnormalities. No, the US has no claim to moral superiority for calling out others who may have used chemical weapons. (See how US supplied Saddam Hussein with many of the components necessary to manufacture chemical weapons which, indeed, were used against Kurds and Iranians.) War is not the answer and the rabbi should know that.

  • TJtruthandjustice

    The Holocaust is repeatedly and shamelessly exploited by right-wing Israelis to push forward their geopolitical agendas. Israel’s right-wing Likud war party and its AIPAC allies in the U.S. are gunning hard for the U.S. to bomb Syria, just as they lobbied extensively for the U.S. to invade Iraq, another instance when the Holocaust/Hitler analogy was used over and over. It’s no surprise that the Holocaust would be invoked in this case.

  • concerned

    It’s extremely irresponsible and dangerous to compare events in Syria where no one is even knows for sure what’s happening and who is at fault with Holocaust. Rabbi is very wrong!!!

Robin and Jeremy

Robin Young and Jeremy Hobson host Here & Now, a live two-hour production of NPR and WBUR Boston.

August 20 Comment

James Foley Remembered For His ‘Extraordinary Courage’

U.S. officials have confirmed the authenticity of a video showing the beheading of the American journalist.

August 20 5 Comments

L.A. Moves To Arrest Fewer Misbehaving Students

The change in the school district's policy is the culmination of a long fight by judges, government officials, advocates and attorneys.

August 19 5 Comments

Abandoned Homes In Buffalo, N.Y. Selling For $1

Instead of tearing the homes down, city officials are selling them for $1, as part of the "Urban Homestead Program."

August 19 Comment

A Look At U.S. Military Options In Iraq

Retired Admiral William Fallon, who was head of United States Central Command during the Iraq War, discusses the current conflict.