90.9 WBUR - Boston's NPR news station
Top Stories:
Here and Now with Robin Young
Public radio's live
midday news program
With sponsorship from
Mathworks - Accelerating the pace of engineering and science
Accelerating the pace
of engineering and science
Thursday, August 29, 2013

Senator On Syria: ‘We Just Can’t Take On Anything Else’

Senate Armed Services Committee member Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., left, is pictured in January 2013. At right is Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., the ranking Republican on the committee. (Susan Walsh/AP)

Senate Armed Services Committee member Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., left, is pictured in January 2013. At right is Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., the ranking Republican on the committee. (Susan Walsh/AP)

Congress is in recess until September 9th, but lawmakers are calling for congressional involvement to any U.S. response to Syria’s use of chemical weapons against civilians last week.

This evening, U.S. House and Senate leaders will get a briefing from the White House. President Obama has said he is certain that the chemical weapon attack was initiated by Syria’s President Bashar Assad.

Some lawmakers, including Democratic Senator Ed Markey of Massachusetts say they would support “surgical” strikes that don’t involve civilians. Republican Senator John McCain of Arizona says the U.S. needs to act.

But Republican Senator Jim Inhofe of Oklahoma — a ranking member of the Senate Armed Services Committee — is one of the few against any response.

“I’m opposing military action by us,” Inhofe told Here & Now. “We just can’t take on anything else.”

He says the Defense Department budget cuts due to sequestration have been too great to use military resources.

“I’ve taken my position for a reason that no one else is talking about,” Inhofe said. “My concern is this: This president has gutted the military during the four-and-a-half years that he’s been in. And right now, we’re in a position where in order just to meet the expectations of sequestration, he’s furloughing people.”




From NPR and WBUR Boston, I'm Robin Young.


I'm Jeremy Hobson. It's HERE AND NOW. British Prime Minister David Cameron responded today to tough questions from members of Parliament about whether the U.K. should sanction military intervention in Syria. We'll get the latest from London in a few minutes.

YOUNG: But first, the debate in Congress, or the lack of it. Congress is in summer recess until September 9th, but lawmakers are calling for congressional involvement in any U.S. response. This evening, House and Senate leaders will get a briefing via teleconference, but President Obama says he is certain that the chemical weapon attack against Syrian civilians was initiated by Assad's government, crossing the red line he'd drawn.

Last night on PBS, he added concern that those weapons could someday be used against the U.S. Some lawmakers - like Senator Ed Markey, the Democrat from Massachusetts - say they would support surgical strikes that don't involve civilians. Senator Jim Inhofe - the Republican from Oklahoma, and a ranking member of the Senate Armed Service Committee - is one of the few against any response.

Senator, your thoughts. Why? Make your case.

SENATOR JIM INHOFE: Well, I think, first of all, I've taken my position for a reason that no one else is talking about, Robin, and I'm opposing military action in Syria by us. My concern is this: This president has gutted the military during the four-and-a-half years that he's been in, and right now, we're in a position where, in order just to meet the expectations of sequestration, he's furloughing people.

Robin, I've got 14,000 civilian employees in Tinker Air Force Base, and they've having to be furloughed as we speak. We had - the president had to ground 16 of the flying squadrons. You can't do that and then expect to have those people up and ready to do some type of a - what they call a surgical attack.

So I've been opposed to this, because we just can't take on anything else.

YOUNG: Well, you write: No red line should have been drawn without the strategy and funding to support it. But is there some irony there? Because, of course, the White House and the Democrats blame Republicans for not coming to some kind of a deal so that sequestration wouldn't have had to happen.

INHOFE: No, they are dreaming. That isn't what happened. We have sequestration right now because of the excessive spending of this president since - in the first part of his office. If you remember, the deficit that he's given us, you remember the $800 billion so-called stimulus, all of these things were - it seems like it was heavy spending on everything except for the military.

And I knew this was going to happen. Four-and-a-half years ago, when the president came out with his first budget, I went to Afghanistan so I could respond, because I knew he'd be devastating our military. And sure enough, he did.

YOUNG: Senator, what about your fellow Republicans like John McCain, who say you can't delay reaction to what is essentially a massacre, as he says. You saw these pictures of dead children. Come on, this is horrific. We can't stand by and watch this happen.

INHOFE: You know, I can remember when we stood by and let the - in 1994, in Rwanda, when the genocide took place. There are tragedies that are taking place all over. If we had a - the military with adequate support, yes, I would certainly look at that and want to do something. I'm sympathetic about the devastation that's taking place in Syria.

It's very similar to what happened with Saddam Hussein and the Kurds in the north, and I was very much opposed to what he did, and we wanted to help at that time. That was different, because now, we have a military that's just been - as I say, it's been devastated. We can't take on any more military responsibilities.

YOUNG: Well, you mentioned Saddam Hussein and the Kurds. Of course, he horrifically gassed the Kurds, and there was no response. There was, however, an attack on Iraq years later, long after that, and when we now know there was no evidence of weapons of mass destruction. Is the shadow of Iraq also over some of the thinking today?

INHOFE: Well, see, first of all, I disagree with the statement when you say no weapons of mass destruction. I don't want to open that up for a debate. However, when you're talking about gassing people, and - that is a weapon of mass destruction.

YOUNG: But the response was years later. In other words, the war in Iraq was not - was 17 years, I think, after Saddam Hussein gassed the Kurds.

INHOFE: OK. What's the question, then?

YOUNG: Well, is the shadow of Iraq and the fear of another slippery slope, or making a mistake, is that also behind either your decision or the decision or the decision of some of your fellow lawmakers?

INHOFE: No. No, it isn't. If we just take - I don't know about anyone else. In fact, I think I'm probably the only one who has this strong a feeling about not putting our military into another situation where it could be - use our rare assets. Right now, we don't have spare assets, spare resources to use. We are overworked. We have an off-tempo - the word, the term that is used for the operation tempo - that's unacceptable for our Guard, our Reserve and our regular forces.

YOUNG: By the way, are you surprised there haven't been more voices raised with concern?

INHOFE: I am, a little bit. You quoted Ed Markey, and I think the left probably would take the position that he has. I'm not being critical of him. Actually, Ed's a good friend of mine. But to say that he would approve of surgical strikes kind of gives the impression that this is nice and clean. We won't get our hands dirty. It won't cost anything. It'll solve the problem. Well, that isn't the case, in my opinion.

YOUNG: Jim Inhofe, Republican senator for Oklahoma. Senator Inhofe, thank you so much.

INHOFE: Thank you, Robin. Transcript provided by NPR, Copyright NPR.

Please follow our community rules when engaging in comment discussion on this site.
  • JD

    What is Sen. Inhoffe talking about? The sequester exists only because the republicans would not make a deal, and th emilitary is the least effected part of govt., proportionally. The man just doesn’t acknowledge facts that he does not like.

    • Invtr

      I love it! GOP is at fault because of the sequester and they blame one person.

  • LJ

    This guy is a joke!! Republicans tie the hands of the President then blame him for everything! I am sick of the tail ( far right republicans) wagging the dog!

  • http://www.goodreads.com/ Beau Guest

    Perhaps this is another benefit of the sequester. We don’t have enough money to get into conflicts where we don’t belong and are really not wanted. It is my understanding that polls in the middle east show the average person is against our so-called help, notwithstanding the desires of the regime leaders in the middle east.

  • PoliticsWatcher

    The USA spends as much on war as the rest of the world combined. Something is seriously wrong with that picture if we are NOT involved in every war on the planet.

    And the 10% sequester cut? Irrelevant.

  • Invtr

    I think we need to remove the problem in the USA. Remove the GOP Cult. No matter what Obama does he’s not doing it correctly per GOP Cult. I think the GOP Cult is dividing our country to be honest.

    • fun bobby

      so you think another war is a good idea?

      • archierouge

        as if Inhofe actually responded to that question…

        • fun bobby

          apparently you and he have that in common

          • archierouge

            I wasn’t the one asked on Here and Now, was I.

          • fun bobby

            so you think another war is a good idea?

  • sandersdogman

    This man’s profession is not a U.S. Senator it is professional liar. Why waste time with these lunatics. Give them facts and they just deny them. There were WMD’s in Iraq? There is no sense in giving any Republican a forum. If this is a U.S. the United States of America is not a great country.

  • hilo

    Congratulations on countering Imhoff’s attack on the President’s “gutting” the military when the Republicans chose to rebuff any compromise, but unfortunately you let him gas on about lack of funding without taking any responsibility for the lack of budget and harping on the old song about the stimulus, which did far better than Republican’ts are willing to acknowledge, while they gut the nation’s school, infra-structure, and every public service.

  • SDH de Lorge

    The perpetual mystery is raised again.

    Is Sen Jim Inhofe really that cynical, or does he have an uncommonly well organized paranoid disorder? He manages to project all the bad things onto others, while reserving an illusion (or a delusion) of virtue and wisdom for himself.

    Why consult him for factual information about national issues? Or is the practice continued as a solicitous gesture toward political power, and toward those among the public who are benighted by ignorance or by distorted perceptions of reality? Attributing all these ills to Obama is madness, as is the specific issue of blame for decimating the military. Who swallows this stuff whole?

  • amyallen

    I blame Here and Now for not responding to the inaccuracies of Senator Inhofe with the facts about defense spending, the sequester and deficit spending. He should not be allowed to make false accusations without correction. Shame on you, Here and Now.

    • archierouge

      I agree 100%

  • fun bobby

    it does seem at the very least to be fiscally unwise to pursue war. kudos Sen Inhoffe!

    • okjb1168

      Yes, too bad his powers for budgeting for a war only awakened AFTER Iraq/

      • fun bobby

        better late than never. I have to support anyone who is in favor of peace no matter how they came to that conclusion.

  • SDH de Lorge

    So if this show replaces TOTN, why isn’t its Disqus feature integrated with the NPR comments? And why can’t I scroll down the screen without going to the scroll bar?

  • archierouge

    You could ask Inhofe what his favorite color is and he’d respond by launching into a partisan hate tirade against the President. “Obama has decimated the military?” Hardly, Mr. Inhofe. I would have hoped that Here and Now producers would have balanced Inhofe’s partisan propaganda with another, more to-the-point view of teh situation in Syria. Instead they left a lot of angry listeners in the wake of this ludicrous interview

  • Rhonda

    Thank GOD somebody has tried to stop that incompetent ,communist, trying to destroy America .

Robin and Jeremy

Robin Young and Jeremy Hobson host Here & Now, a live two-hour production of NPR and WBUR Boston.

August 28 Comment

Catching Up With The Polyphonic Spree

The choral rock band out of Dallas, Texas, has been thrilling audiences with its live performances for over a decade.

August 28 5 Comments

‘Enormous’ Growth Of Ocean Garbage Patch

The oceanographer who discovered the floating island of trash in 1997 says he's shocked by how much it's grown.

August 27 Comment

Veteran Honored, But Struggles To Keep Business Open

Former Marine Matt Victoriano is being recognized as a "Champion of Change" at the White House.

August 27 40 Comments

In Defense Of Schlock Music: Why We Love/Hate It

Music critic Jody Rosen defends the kind of over-the-top, sentimental songs that Journey, Lionel Richie, Billy Joel and Prince made famous.