90.9 WBUR - Boston's NPR news station
Top Stories:
PLEDGE NOW
Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Employers Weigh Math And Morality In Offering Health Care

If the Supreme Court upholds the Affordable Care Act, will employers decide to offer coverage to employees or pay a fine? If the justices strike down the law, will employers start cutting benefits that have already kicked in, like preventive screenings with no co-pays and coverage for children up to 26-years-olds?

Chantel Sheaks of Buck Consultants advises companies on health care issues. She says it’s often a numbers game.

Under health care reform, most companies with more than 50 employees must offer insurance, or face fines of $2,000 per employee. Some companies might decide that it would be cheaper to pay that fine than offer benefits. For example, Sheaks says companies with a low-paid or transient workforce might be better off paying the fines.

But even companies that offer benefits to their employees could be hit with fines. The government will fine companies $3,000 for each employee who opts into a government-subsidized “insurance exchange,” instead of their work-sponsored plan.

Sheaks says the insurance exchange might offer better coverage at a lower price than the company offers. The $3,000 fine encourages companies to stay competitive with the exchange. But Sheaks says some companies may decide that it’s more cost-effective to pay these fines than to offer the plan.

Will More Employers Offer Insurance?

After Massachusetts adopted its universal health care law in 2005, the percentage of employers offering coverage to employees went from 69 percent to 76 percent in 2010.

Sheaks says Massachusetts might not be the best example for the rest of the country, because it has a highly-trained and competitive workforce. In other parts of the country, employers might not need to offer insurance to remain competitive in their industries.

Beyond The Numbers

However, companies are considering more than dollars and cents when it comes to offering health care coverage.

The health care consultancy company, Avalere, conducted a study last year that found companies offer insurance to boost productivity and to retain and recruit employees. But the study also found that some companies consider it a moral obligation:

…there are many intangible reasons why employers offer coverage to employees, such as the value employees assign to the benefit, and the feeling amongst some employers that offering health benefits is the “right thing to do.”

Even if the Supreme Court strikes down the Affordable Care Act, some employers may find it difficult to take away benefits that have already been given under the law.

“Once you give someone something, good luck taking it away,” Sheaks said. “Not gonna happen.”

Guest:

  • Chantel Sheaks, principal at Buck Consultants

We welcome comments from all of our listeners. Post below. Please stay on topic and be civil. Comments may be moderated by us, but you are solely responsible for the content of your comments.

  • Oregon

    Not only would a single payer system be cheaper than paying for all the markups, administrative costs and bloated executive salaries of a private insurance system, it would also address every problem that was raised on the show today.

  • Clara

    Too much emphasis on treatments and little on prevention.

    Treatments = big steady profits for the insurance industry, Big Pharma and the medicrats.
    Prevention = not so good for the stock holders at Big Pharma and others dependent on the ill, ailing and dying.
    Capitalism despises self sufficiency. Its thrives better when the masses are dependent on something or someone.

    There is just too much money to be made having a population indulging in those evils which make them sick or kill them. Examples are tobacco, alcohol, too much junk food and too many medications.

    Eliminate the problems and the economy as we know it, goes to hell.
    There’s big money in problems.

    As Dr. Herbert M. Shelton said in the 1950′s:

    Capitalism is devoted to the principle of controlling evils rather than remedying them.

  • Sa

    The more corrupt the state, the more numerous its laws.  Tacitus.
    It was true 2,000 years ago and its worse today.
    This insurance mandate. A mandate is nothing more than another law or decree.
    Over 40,000 new laws went into effect on January 2012.What hasn’t according to our great leaders been deemed illegal?At this time, it still isn’t illegal to breathe the air around you.
    The trend in America for years has been a growing Big Brother to keep you in check or under control.Whether its the Nanny State, Police State, Surveillance State and you name it, its all the same.We have taken “people watching” in America to new heights.Beware people, surely there are those working on making it a crime concerning your very thoughts. The State is watching.
    If you want a vision of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face – forever.  George Orwell

  • Lou

    Just another way for the corporations to get your money from you.One more tax, fee, penalty or whatever you wish to label it. Look at the dozens of taxes which people are subject to on a daily basis.The bureaucrats and ruling class are always scheming ways to part your money from you, whether willingly or by some law, decree, edict or stealth.
    Its business as usual in capitalism. Its requires markets to sell their wares or they die. Parasitism at its finest.

  • Barky

    Both major parties claim they want less government, however in the end they both create more government bureaucracy. Endless laws annually across the country. Every time you turn another, you are in violation of one of their laws. Most of this is nothing more than job creation schemes.I saw posted here or elsewhere a quotation from the Roman senator and historian Tacitus.”The more corrupt the state, the more numerous its laws.”
    What is a mandate? By definition its a law among other things. Who does Congress truly represent? The working class or the ruling class?Who is influenced by the special interests and lobbyists?The answer is clear

With Sponsorship from:
Accelerating the pace of engineering and science
Monday, June 17, 2013
Cancer patient Lynne Lobel, 47, watches a television program as she gets chemotherapy treatment at Nevada Cancer Institute in Las Vegas, September 2005. (Jae C. Hong/AP)

The sequester budget cuts mean lower reimbursements for chemotherapy drugs for Medicare patients — a change that’s forcing some cancer clinics to turn away patients, in order to make ends meet.

3 Comments | more »
Friday, June 14, 2013
Paul Eisenstein is publisher of "The Detroit Bureau."

We usually talk to reporter Paul Eisenstein about cars, but when he mentioned he’d recently had a brush with death, we wanted to know more.

4 Comments | more »
Thursday, June 13, 2013
The sun sets behind the Jeffrey Energy Center coal power plant in Emmett, Kan. in December 2012. (Charlie Riedel/AP)

The International Energy Agency is warning that unless nations take urgent action to reduce carbon dioxide levels, average temperatures on the earth could rise by more than nine degrees Fahrenheit.

4 Comments | more »